Institute of WorkComp Professionals

7 Secrets that Cost Your Client a Bundle on their Workers' Comp

The $600,000 Turnaround

March 16, 2015 | By admin@iwcp

The Stakes: A non-profit distribution company with 450 employees was in dire straits. Their Experience Mod had hit a punishing 2.04, forcing them into the state’s “assigned risk pool” and triggering heavy ARAP surcharges. The Investigation: The Advisor audited the loss runs and premium audit sheets. They found a chaotic paper trail: claims had been […]

Continue Reading

The Wellness Win

March 16, 2015 | By admin@iwcp

The Stakes: An auto parts manufacturer with 170 employees saw their claims costs spiking. What had been a manageable 7% annual increase suddenly jumped to over 20%, threatening profitability. The Investigation: The Advisor walked the factory floor and reviewed the safety minutes. They identified a cultural problem: employees were afraid to report safety violations (like […]

Continue Reading

The “Family Tree” Error

March 16, 2015 | By admin@iwcp

The Stakes: A family-owned business with 15 employees saw their Experience Mod inexplicably jump from 0.99 to 1.27. There were no major accidents to explain the increase, but the premium hike was real. The Investigation: The Advisor compared the WCIRB (Rating Bureau) worksheet against their own projections. The numbers didn’t match. The Breakthrough: The investigation […]

Continue Reading

The 35-Error Audit

March 16, 2015 | By admin@iwcp

The Stakes: A social services agency with 315 employees was watching their Mod climb to 1.85. Management felt the system was “out of control.” They had no idea why premiums were soaring, only that they couldn’t stop it. The Investigation: The Advisor collected three years of loss data and compared it to the Mod worksheets. […]

Continue Reading

The $40,000 Typo

March 16, 2015 | By admin@iwcp

The Stakes: A leasing company for construction trailers expected a Mod of 0.90 based on their safety record. But when the official worksheet arrived from the Rating Bureau, the Mod was set at 0.97—a costly difference. The Investigation: Most agents accept the Bureau’s math as gospel. The CWCA reviewed the worksheet line-by-line. The Breakthrough: They […]

Continue Reading

The 14-Point Plan

March 16, 2015 | By admin@iwcp

The Stakes: A plastics manufacturer was facing a financial cliff. Their Mod was already 1.35, and a new hike was about to push it to 1.685, adding $78,000 to their bill. Their average annual injury costs were over $200,000. The Investigation: The Advisor found that the company had no set procedure for reporting injuries. Supervisors […]

Continue Reading

The “Medical-Only” Mistake

March 16, 2015 | By admin@iwcp

The Stakes: A modular home manufacturer saw their Mod creeping up to 1.07. They couldn’t understand why small claims were having such a big impact. The Investigation: The Advisor reviewed the claim files and found a coding error. A series of knee, shoulder, and hand injuries had been coded as “Indemnity” (lost time) claims. The […]

Continue Reading

The Zero Lost Time Standard

March 16, 2015 | By admin@iwcp

The Stakes: A plumbing contractor with 265 employees was struggling with a Mod of 0.98. The issue wasn’t just the number of claims; it was “malingering”—employees staying home longer than necessary. 80% of their claims included indemnity payments. The Investigation: The Advisor identified the lack of an injury management process as the root cause. Without […]

Continue Reading

Getting a Grip on Costs

March 16, 2015 | By admin@iwcp

The Stakes: An electronics manufacturer spun off from a national parent company and immediately saw their Mod spike to 1.45. The culprit? Severe repetitive injuries to hands and wrists from light assembly work. The Investigation: The Advisor found that the company was hiring workers physically unsuited for repetitive tasks. Once injured, these workers drifted into […]

Continue Reading

The “Worst Case” Reserve

March 16, 2015 | By admin@iwcp

The Stakes: A new home construction employee suffered a finger laceration. It was a bad cut, but the insurance carrier reacted by setting the reserves at the absolute maximum—accounting for potential disfigurement and permanent loss of use. The Investigation: The Advisor knew that carriers often set high reserves and forget about them. These inflated numbers […]

Continue Reading