FMLA, ADA Updates
New FMLA Military Leave Amendment
On October 27, 2009, President Obama signed the 2010 National Defense Authorization Act, which contained new amendments to the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). By way of background, the 2008 National Defense Authorization Act created a new leave right under the FMLA for families of service members. The new Act further expands FMLA coverage and available leave for military families in the following ways:
Lessons Learned: The new amendments direct the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) to work with the Secretaries of Defense and the Veterans Administration to draft regulations implementing the amendments. The legislation does not make clear whether the law goes into effect immediately or whether it will become effective after the new regulations are issued. It would be prudent, however, to proceed as if the law were in effect if faced with a request by an employee seeking leave to care for an eligible service member under the expanded law.
-HR That Works!
Leave and light duty policies may run afoul of ADA
The federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sued Jewel-Osco and its corporate parent, saying the Chicago area’s biggest supermarket chain violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Since November 2003, Jewel-Osco allegedly prohibited employees on a one-year paid disability leave from returning to work unless they had no mental or physical restrictions, or unless they could return to work “without any accommodation to full service,” the EEOC alleges. The suit also challenges the company’s refusal to allow disabled workers who weren’t injured on the job from participating in a 90-day light-duty program.
On the heals of the largest ADA lawsuit settlement in the history of the EEOC (Sears, Roebuck & Co.), this demonstrates the need for employers to review policies affecting workers with disabilities.
Understanding the ADA Association provision
More “association discrimination” cases are being filed under the ADA. The association provision is based on an employee’s relationship with a person who has a disability. A company cannot refuse to hire an applicant because they are concerned about the applicant’s responsibilities in caring for a disabled person. Moreover, companies cannot reject applicants because disabled family members might produce increased health costs.