Workers' Compensation regulatory challenges for employers in 2024
While many of the issues in work comp are familiar and ongoing, there were significant changes in 2023, reflecting broader shifts in the workplace, regulatory and legal actions, technological advancements, and emerging risks. These changing trends offer insights into the challenges employers will face in 2024. This month we'll look at the regulatory trends and next month we'll review the workplace health and safety trends.
Federal regulatory actions - OSHA, NLRB, CMS
OSHA
With hardline enforcement, targeted initiatives, drastically increased penalty authority, new and expanded emphasis programs, an aggressive rulemaking agenda, 20 percent more federal inspectors, and new records for enforcement actions, OSHA needs to be on the radar screen for all employers in 2024. Key issues include:
- The most significant OSHA recordkeeping update in eight years went into effect January 2, 2024. This expands coverage to thousands more establishments, increases the scope of data required for submission, gives unprecedented access to workplace data, and can be published on the OSHA website. Further, for insurance companies, OSHA public records provide a different lens into a business's safety risk profile. It's critical to understand the rule and only record cases that are required by the regulations.
- In July 2023, OSHA launched a three-year nationwide emphasis program (NEP) for warehouse and distribution center operations and "high-risk" retail establishments. After a three-month outreach program, inspections began in mid-October, and by early December 220 inspections were opened. Except for inspections of high injury rate retail establishments, inspections under the NEP are comprehensive safety inspections and will focus on common workplace hazards, including powered industrial vehicle operations, material handling/storage, walking-working surfaces, means of egress, and fire protection as well as heat and ergonomic hazards. Employers should determine if they are subject to the NEP. If so, they should audit safety protocols to ensure compliance and educate safety personnel and managers on what to do if OSHA arrives for an inspection.
- In January 2023, OSHA issued a memorandum to Area Offices regarding certain "instance-by-instance" (IBI) violations, which gives discretion NOT to group violations to "achieve a deterrent effect" for each high-gravity serious violation of OSHA standards related to falls, trenching, machine guarding, respiratory protection, permit-required confined spaces, and lockout/tagout. It will also allow IBI penalties for other-than-serious violations related to recordkeeping. This can escalate penalties and increase the possibility of being placed in the dreaded Severe Violator Enforcement Program (SVEP).
- Although it is uncertain if a proposed rule will be released in 2024, a heat standard has been heralded as a top priority and OSHA has aggressively leveraged other tools for enforcement. In 2022, it launched a NEP, which remains in effect until April 2025, to protect workers from heat illness and injuries when the National Weather Service issues a heat warning or advisory for a local area and the new Warehousing NEP requires an assessment of heat or ergonomic hazards. If OSHA determines either of these hazards is present, a health inspection will be conducted.
The comment period for the proposed rule ended in late December and a review of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) report is planned for January. A new document provides employers with an outline of what the standard may look like. It also can be helpful to understand what may be involved in a heat illness or injury inspection.
California, which has an outdoor heat standard, is expected to enact an indoor heat standard by summer 2024.
- In late September, OSHA launched a new initiative focused on enhancing enforcement and providing compliance assistance to protect workers in the engineered stone fabrication and installation industries. By December, 67 inspections had been opened.
- In July, OSHA announced a proposed rule to clarify the requirements for the fit of personal protective equipment in construction. It noted the "failure" of standard-sized personal protective equipment to fit smaller construction workers, especially women. Since this is a clarification, rather than a substantive change, it's expected to become final in 2024.
- A notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to update an existing standard and expand safety and health protections for emergency responders, including firefighters, emergency medical service providers, and technical search and rescue workers is expected to be published this month. An unofficial version is available here.
- A federal Prevention of Workplace Violence in Healthcare and Social Assistance rule is in the pre-rule stage and is unlikely to happen in 2024. However, the recent rise in fatal workplace injuries which was attributed, in part, to rising workplace violence could lead to an increased focus during inspections. In May 2023, OSHA clarified when it considers a workplace violence incident recordable in a standard letter of interpretation. The injury will be considered work-related if the employee's work was a causal element of the injury or illness. Employers should be mindful of this for recordkeeping and general clause compliance.
Meanwhile, California passed a law, S.B. 553, that requires general industry employers to have a workplace violence prevention plan and requires Cal/OSHA to begin enforcement on July 1, 2024 (a Violence Prevention in Healthcare standard has been in effect since 2017).
- The long-awaited update to the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS), which regulates the classification and labeling of hazardous chemicals in the workplace, has been sent to the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and is expected to become final soon. All the revised provisions in the proposed HCS become effective two years after publication of the final rule, with training required in advance so employers and employees will recognize and understand the new labels and safety data sheets. The rule aligns the HazCom with the latest version of the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals ("GHS") and presents some significant changes, initially affecting chemical manufacturers, importers, exporters, and distributors. The changes that will later impact employers relate to labeling and SDS. According to OSHA, the proposed updates will affect 115,758 firms, 152,427 establishments, and 1,510,780 employees.
- OSHA has been mum on its plans for the COVID-19 Healthcare standard and its plans for an infectious disease standard. In the most recent regulatory agenda, it updated its proposed rulemaking target date for a permanent infectious disease standard to June 2024 and the description now includes COVID-19. It may be that a specific COVID-19 rule for healthcare has been shelved in favor of a broader rule.
- The Fall regulatory agenda released in December indicates rulemaking actions for trucks, tree care and fall prevention, walking-working surfaces, and use of subpoenas could happen as soon as February 2024. A planned update to the standard on lockout/tagout has been moved to the proposed rule stage with a target date of August 2024. However, dates in the agenda are often tentative.
- A spike in child labor violations has caught the attention of DOL, OSHA, and Congress. In a recent case in Mississippi, OSHA obtained a warrant to secure access to the plant, investigate safety hazards related to the death of a 16-year-old employee, and interview workers. A Wisconsin sawmill was fined nearly $1.4M after allowing teen workers to operate dangerous machinery and a California poultry processor was fined over $3M for endangering young workers. The Department of Labor (DOL) Wage and Hour Divisions now issues fines related to child labor violations on a per violation basis as opposed to a per child basis, dramatically increasing the potential penalties for employers. Managers must be trained and implement the relevant child labor laws.
- Several Regional Emphasis Programs were renewed or expanded, including those related to noise hazards, poultry processing facilities, seafood processing, tree trimming and clearing operations, oil and gas service industry and more.
- In its proposed rule to amend the Representatives of Employers and Employees regulation, OSHA would empower inspectors to designate union, community activist, or any other third-party representatives to accompany them during an inspection, simply based on an employee request. Many employer organizations have strongly opposed the rule, noting it opens the door for union organizers, individuals, or groups with grievances against an employer, or exploitation of confidential or proprietary information. The public comment period ended November 13, 2023, and OSHA will review the comments, finalize, and publish the rule. Once a final rule is published, a legal challenge to the rule by the employer community is expected. Employers should be aware of the potential impact on their workplace.
- OSHA penalties will continue to rise. Effective January 16, OSHA penalties increased 3.2 percent. The maximum penalties for willful or repeat violations are now $161,323 and $16,131 for serious, other-than-serious, failure-to-correct, and posting-requirement violations.
NLRB
There were many new directives from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in 2023, most focusing on narrowing existing work rules and expanding union protections. From a work comp perspective, the new joint-employer rule, which sets a much broader standard for determining joint employer status, is a lightning rod of dispute. Now marred with legal challenges, the NLRB recently voted to delay the rule's effective date until Feb. 26, 2024. Employers should watch these challenges closely and prepare for compliance with the rule in early 2024. Also, employers should be aware of the multiple Memoranda of Understandings (MOU) issued with other federal agencies, including OSHA, to exchange information discovered during investigations, which may violate other regulations.
Also concerning is that the NLRB general counsel wants to eliminate the current requirement that an employee must suffer an adverse employment action for agency prosecutors to prove illegal anti-union discrimination. Further, the general counsel would like to extend "Weingarten rights," to non-union settings. This gives employees the right to representation in any investigative interview that could reasonably lead to discipline.
CMS
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has been taking more aggressive steps to ensure employers and employees consider Medicare's interests in all work comp cases. In a recent webinar, CMS announced it is considering the expansion of Section 111 Non-Group Health Plan Total Payment Obligation to Claimant (TPOC) reporting to include Workers' Compensation Medicare Set-Aside (WCMSA) information. It made clear that they are looking for reported WCMSA information from all workers' compensation settlements involving Medicare beneficiaries, regardless of whether the Medicare Set-Aside was voluntarily submitted and reviewed by CMS or was a non-submit/evidence-based Medicare Set-Aside. Although reporting TPOC has always included the amount of a WCMSA, RREs have never had to specifically report details of the WCMSA itself. The changes could have a significant impact on Section 111 reporting and WCMSA compliance, and updates on the proposal should be monitored. Employers should work with insurers and their MSA partners to take a hard look at how this affects their practices. CMS projects a January 2025 implementation date.
The average set-aside recommendation in the fiscal year that ended in June was $86,452.67, up 5.98% compared with the $81,571.75 average set-aside in the 2022 fiscal year. The average set-aside recommendation for the 15,743 claims reviewed in fiscal year 2023 was 21.95 percent higher than the average proposed set-aside of $70,887.33.
Another CMS issue potentially affecting work comp is the effort to reduce drug costs by negotiating prices for a variety of different medications with pharmaceutical companies. This could lead to lower costs for comp or lead to higher prices if pharmacies cost-shift. Providers are billing above fee schedules for various medications, and they're pushing back against CMS' plan to roll back temporary pandemic-related price increases. States like Florida are raising their fee schedules, leading to higher costs for some drugs.
Rating bureaus - NCCI and PCRB
Both the National Council on Compensation Insurance (NCCI) and the Pennsylvania Compensation Rating Bureau (PCRB) received approval for revisions that are designed to make the experience mod function more effectively and more accurately capture an employer's loss experience. The changes should make the formula more equitable with best-performing employers getting better mods and poor performers getting worse mods. Those in the middle are likely to see minimal impact. While the mod formula is not changing, the alterations aim to enhance the mod's primary purpose - leveraging past employer experience to predict future losses and appropriately price workers' compensation policies.
The NCCI adjustments will go into effect on each state's regular rate filing date on or after November 1, 2023. The rollout started with Washington, D.C. and West Virginia, and will conclude with Rhode Island on August 1, 2024. A key component of the change is that the new methodology will establish a unique split point for each state based on that state's loss experience, whereas previously there was a uniform split point across all NCCI states. The split point impacts how primary and discounted losses are factored into the mod calculation.
In Pennsylvania, the changes will increase the number of employers that qualify for experience rating and will impact employers across the state beginning April 1, 2024. It's projected 21,000 to 22,000 employers that currently do not have an experience rating will get one.
The changes will impact businesses differently and employers are advised to discuss the implications with their insurance agent.