Both in the media and in general conversation, we often hear people refer to the Workers' Compensation laws in various states as being very "employee friendly." They feel that it's easy for injured employees to get more than they "deserve" from the workers' comp system.
This may be true, but there is little or no question that there are laws in some states that are more business friendly as opposed to employee friendly. But employers would do well to ignore this debate because, in reality, when employers put the right systems in place and implement a positive corporate culture, both employers and employees benefit.
As an employer, communicating with employees before they suffer an injury is key. However, when we discuss this idea with employers, they are often hesitant, stating, "If we tell them how comp works, they'll just want to file a claim!"
It doesn't need to be this way. You should have an employee meeting to discuss workers' comp. Here's how the dialog between employer and employee should go:
"We buy workers' compensation insurance as a benefit for you, our employees, to make sure that when you are injured while you are working for us that your medical and lost wage expenses are covered. Your medical expenses will be covered 100%. There are no co-pays or deductibles like there are when you are sick or have to go to the doctor for personal reasons.
We cover all lost wages as well. However, the law requires a few things. First, the law in our state requires that during the first seven days (this number will vary from state to state) you are out of work, you do not receive pay. This might seem unfair but it's the law and out of our control. If you are out more than a week, the insurance company will pay you 66 2/3% of what you are making now. (Each state has a maximum amount an employee can receive. If relevant, you might mention it as well)
I know 66% seems low, and we agree. So that is why we built a recovery at work program, so that when you are injured, we can bring you back to work and pay your full salary, even if the doctor says that you can't immediately go back to your regular job.
We work with Dr. Welby from Welby's's Urgent Care (it works even better if Dr. Welby is actually at the meeting). Dr. Welby will make it his priority to see you immediately should you suffer an injury, so you aren't stuck in a waiting room for hours before being seen."
OK, let's break down what you just communicated to your employees:
In the vast majority of states the employer can at least recommend which doctor an injured employee should see when injured. When you let an injured employee go to their personal doctor (or worse, to the emergency room), the stage is set for the Workers' Compensation claim to go sideways and cost additional dollars even before the employee completes the first doctor's visit.
Employers should identify - with their agent's assistance - a doctor who is skilled in treating occupational injuries. Local urgent care clinics are a great source because many are already advertising services as Workers' Compensation doctors. Many of these clinics are searching for business partners.
When you visit a facility, make sure there is not live TV on in the waiting room. Daytime television is rife with ads for attorneys, and it not a good idea to have them chirping in the ear of an injured employee before they even have the opportunity to see the treating physician.
When you partner with physicians, invite them to visit your facility. The more the doctors understand your process, the more effective they can be in setting restrictions for injured employees. Speaking of restrictions, you want physicians who will send every employee back to work with restrictions unless they are in one of the following three conditions:
Other than these three issues, the injured employee should be back at work doing something, rather than just sitting at home. If physicians are going to return injured employees to work, they must understand that the employer has a functioning Recovery-at-Work program. Recovery-at-Work programs benefit both the injured employee and the employer. When injured employees return to work, they tend to get better faster. It's unlikely the insurance company will pay indemnity benefits, thus reducing the cost of the Workers' Compensation claim. In many states where no indemnity is paid, the claim qualifies for a 70% discount on the experience modification factor. Moreover, employees can continue to collect their full wage rather than the 66.7% that most states mandate the insurance company to pay, feel productive and valuable, shielding them from developing the all-consuming disability mindset that spells disaster for workers' comp claims.
Bottom line: With Recovery-at-Work, the injured employee is likely to return to their full duty job more quickly, while also reducing the overall cost to the employer.
When you communicate with employees about how Workers' Compensation works before they suffer an injury, many good things happen. When they know what to expect, the doctor they'll see, and the employer's expectations when they return to work, an employer is very likely to have positive results in the Workers' Compensation program while also having happy, healthy and productive employees.
In a perfect world, no employee would suffer an injury. But you only have to tune in to the nightly news to know the world is far from perfect. Employers who are prepared for employee injuries and have engaged their employees in how the process works will reap the rewards of lower costs and higher productivity.
Regardless of the statutes in your state, when you have a process in place that puts everyone on the same page, that's when Workers' Compensation will work for both the employer and the employees.
Kevin Ring is the Lead Workers' Compensation Analyst for the Institute of WorkComp Professionals, which trains insurance agents to help employers reduce Workers' Compensation expenses.